ArticleTe Reo : proceedings of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand2025
Argument marking in a new sign language.
Article in Te Reo : proceedings of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While there has been no recognized sign language in Vanuatu and no record of intergenerational transmission of language between deaf people, a cohort of deaf children have been attending a school in Port Vila. Previous reports of the gathering together of deaf people, specifically deaf children, have documented the emergence of new sign languages. Studies of emerging sign languages show that linguistic devices for marking argument structure, including word order and grammatical use of space, emerge over time through intergenerational transmission. We examine longitudinal emergence of these devices in the first cohort of a new sign language in Vanuatu. Participants include six deaf children from Vanuatu (ages 8-14, mean 11.6), four of whom had 5-14 months of exposure to Fiji Sign Language. Spontaneous descriptions of sixteen transitive events were elicited using a communicative task. Data were collected 1.5 years after the establishment of the signing community in Vanuatu, and then again one year later. We measured a variety of argument marking strategies: word order, split events, constructed action, assigning characters to present individuals, use of space in marking arguments, spatial modulation of verb, and use of semantic classifiers. Comparing time one and time two rates of argument differentiation strategies in the deaf children, we found a decrease in constructed action and an increase in the use of spatial marking of arguments, classifiers, and spatial modulation of verbs, with few changes in word order. Comparison of these argument marking strategies with those used by thirteen children in Fiji Sign Language, suggests that the change in argument marking is not due to language contact but is arising from sustained community use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41477034PMC12751594What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.