ArticleeGastroenterology2025
Application of machine learning in the discovery of antimicrobial peptides: exploring their potential for ulcerative colitis therapy.
Article in eGastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward microbiota-friendly design and evaluation of antimicrobial peptides: a mini-review.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Article
- From Host-Derived Pressures to the Environmental Anti-Antimicrobial Peptides Resistome: Mechanisms, Reservoirs and Implications for Therapeutic Peptide Design.Marine drugs · 2026Review
- Antimicrobial Peptides Against Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria: Focus on Machine Learning.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Harnessing Machine Learning Approaches for the Identification, Characterization, and Optimization of Novel Antimicrobial Peptides.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory bowel disease with complex aetiology and limited treatment options. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), as endogenous immune effectors, have recently emerged as promising therapeutic agents in UC. However, systematic identification and functional evaluation of AMPs remain underexplored. We aimed to discover novel AMPs with potential therapeutic efficacy in UC by leveraging machine learning-based prediction and validating their impact in an experimental colitis model. Methods: We established a machine learning-driven pipeline to predict candidate AMPs based on their structural and functional features. Top-ranked peptides were synthesised and subjected to in vitro antibacterial assays and proteolytic stability tests. Their therapeutic potential was evaluated using a dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis mouse model, assessing clinical indicators, histopathology, inflammatory markers and gut microbiota alterations. Metagenomic and metabolomic analyses provided insights into microbial community dynamics and metabolic pathways. To probe the role of gut microbes in AMP-mediated gut homeostasis, we conducted Results: Several AMPs identified by machine learning exhibited potent antimicrobial activity and resistance to proteolytic degradation. In vivo, AMP administration ameliorated DSS-induced colitis symptoms, including body weight loss, Disease Activity Index and histological damage. Treatment also modulated the gut microbiome, increasing the abundance of Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that machine learning-guided discovery of AMPs is a viable approach to identify promising therapeutic agents for UC. By integrating multi-omics analyses, we reveal potential microbiota-mediated mechanisms underlying AMP efficacy. These insights provide a strong foundation for advancing AMP-based strategies in UC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.