ArticleiScience2025
A deep learning fusion network trained with medical records and laryngoscopic images in the early diagnosis of glottic carcinoma.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A transformer-based multi-modal fusion framework for laryngeal lesion classification using contact endoscopy.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of glottic carcinoma is crucial for improving the therapeutic outcomes of patients. This study aims to develop a deep learning fusion network that integrates analysis of structured medical records with laryngoscopic images to enable early and accurate diagnosis of glottic carcinoma. The model was trained and validated on data from a tertiary hospital in China. External validation was subsequently conducted across another two independent medical centers. Monomodal reference models were also developed for comparative analysis. To benchmark clinical utility, a human-machine adversarial cohort was constructed to enable direct performance comparisons between the model and human raters. Diagnostic accuracy was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The model achieved superior diagnostic performance compared to monomodal models and achieved performance comparable to senior otolaryngologists. VLMN holds significant potential to reduce diagnostic delays and improve patient prognosis, particularly for junior otolaryngologists or in medically underserved areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.