ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
An economical and feasible method with little trauma for a giant pancreatic pseudocyst communicating with main pancreatic duct: a case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collection is a common complication of both acute and chronic pancreatitis, often presenting as pancreatic pseudocysts (PPCs) or walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Treatment options for PPCs include percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD), surgical drainage (SD), and endoscopic drainage (ED). However, due to the lack of large studies and prospective randomized data, the optimal approach for managing large PPCs remains controversial. Here, we report a case of a patient with a documented history of acute pancreatitis who developed a PPC measuring approximately 5.9 cm × 4.9 cm × 7.7 cm, located posterior to the pancreatic head. He underwent a combined endoscopic and nutritional strategy that involved pancreatic duct stenting for internal drainage, along with the placement of a nasojejunal tube for enteral feeding. After 2 months, the patient showed clinical improvement and a reduction in the size of his PPC on imaging studies. This case highlights that the implantation of a pancreatic duct stent, combined with a nasojejunal nutrition tube, may offer a cost-effective and minimally invasive approach for managing large PPCs that communicate with the main pancreatic duct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.