ArticleStudies in comparative international development2025
Reproductive Justice for Adolescent Migrant Girls in the Post-ICPD Era: A Critical Analysis of Contraceptive Care for Venezuelan Girls in Colombia.
Article in Studies in comparative international development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescent migrant girls face unique challenges to their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) due to their intersecting identities as women, young people, and migrants. Since the first International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) in 1994, reports have increasingly emphasized the prioritization of SRHR for marginalized groups. In this article, I examine the response to contraceptive care needs through the case study of Venezuelan adolescent migrant girls in Colombia, utilizing Reproductive Justice as an analytical framework. I evaluate how state and non-state actors' responses address the intersections of gender, age, and migration to create environments that discourage contraceptive care access. I collected qualitative data through multi-perspective interviews conducted during ethnographic fieldwork in 2022. The sample includes 30 adolescent migrant girls and key informants involved in designing and delivering policies or programs for Venezuelan migrants in Colombia. Overall, the findings show that both state and non-state actors favored short-term, "urgent" interventions over access to adolescent-friendly, migrant-inclusive contraceptive care. I conclude that responses fragment aspects of SRH, deprioritizing contraceptive care and other longer-term intersectional responses in favor of urgent responses, which, in turn, further marginalize adolescent migrant girls. To overcome this, the post-ICPD agenda must recognize SRHR as a continuum and shape responses, aligning responses with the reproductive realities of adolescent migrant girls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.