ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2025
Keratin Additive for Cellular Adhesion in Transcutaneous Prosthetics.
Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing the 3Rs in bone tissue engineering: emergingFrontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Keratin Additive for Cellular Adhesion in Transcutaneous Prosthetics.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The dermal barrier is widely considered the body's first line of defense against most foreign bodies, protecting it from both moisture loss and bacterial invasion. However, when the skin is ruptured for long-term medical interventions (e.g., transcutaneous prosthetics), it is difficult to restore and maintain this protective barrier. Although there are no direct, biological examples of true transcutaneous features in the human body, similar phenomena can be observed in phalangeal nails. This study aims to investigate keratin, the primary component of fingernails, in its hydrolyzed form as an additive to induce cell adhesion in two representative scaffold types. Electrospun fibers and chitosan-gelatin cryogels-two well-characterized scaffolds used in dermal tissue engineering-were selected for this study as a fibrous and macroporous foundation. Both electrospun fibers and cryogels were fabricated with a range of keratin additive concentrations (0, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 wt/wt% and wt/v% for electrospun fibers and cryogels, respectively) and tested for surface properties, mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and material behavior. Overall, it was determined that hydrolyzed keratin had a positive effect on cell adhesion and proliferation but that high quantities of the keratin resulted in adverse effects on the scaffold properties. With dermal applications in mind, this study found that 5 and 7 wt/wt% keratin electrospun fibers possessed required cell counts, surface energies, tensile strength, and contact angle, all with consistent reproducibility. For the cryogels, 3 and 5 wt/v% keratin had the best combined performance, maintained structural integrity through swelling and porosity, and displayed minimal loss in compressive strength. Therefore, hydrolyzed keratin represents a promising additive for bothelectrospun fibers and cryogels in tissue engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.