Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41476854›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2025

Correlation of Bond Strength and Dentinal Tubule Penetration Evaluation of Four Different Endodontic Sealers: AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, Endoseal MTA, and Endoseal TCS (Maruchi): An In Vitro Study.

Arezoo Mirzaei Sadeghloo, Seyedali Seyedmajidi, Akam Saeidi, Elham Mahmoudi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arezoo Mirzaei SadeghlooStudent Research Committee, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Mazandaran, Iran, mubabol.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7138-3104
Seyedali SeyedmajidiDental Materials Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Mazandaran, Iran, mubabol.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3841-0609
Akam SaeidiOral Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Mazandaran, Iran, mubabol.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2005-4896
Elham MahmoudiDental Materials Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Mazandaran, Iran, mubabol.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9972-484X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The sealer's penetration into dentinal tubules creates a physical barrier that entombs any remaining bacteria and increases the surface contact with the root canal walls. This study aimed to evaluate the dentinal tubule penetration and push-out bond strength of four sealers and to assess the correlation between penetration depth and bond strength. Methods: In this in vitro study, 40 human single-rooted anterior teeth were divided into four groups based on the sealer type and obturated using the single cone technique. Three slices of 1 ± 0.1 mm thickness were then prepared from each tooth at three regions-coronal, middle, and apical thirds-perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the root. The depth and percentage of sealer penetration into the dentinal tubules were measured using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) on the prepared slices. To assess the bond strength of the sealers to dentin walls, a push-out bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using SPSS software through ANOVA, Tukey post hoc and Pearson's correlation tests. A Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in the extent and percentage of penetration, and the push-out bond strength of the studied sealers ( Conclusion: Calcium silicate-based sealers (Endoseal MTA and Endoseal TCS) achieved the greatest penetration, whereas AH Plus demonstrated the highest bond strength. The positive correlations observed suggest that dentinal tubule penetration may contribute to stronger bonding for specific sealers.

Indexed as

dental bondingroot canal filling materialsroot canal sealants

Identifiers

PMID41476854
PMCPMC12752899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.