ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2025
Correlation of Bond Strength and Dentinal Tubule Penetration Evaluation of Four Different Endodontic Sealers: AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, Endoseal MTA, and Endoseal TCS (Maruchi): An In Vitro Study.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers Under Conventional and Sonic-Activated Final Irrigation Protocols: An In Vitro Confocal Microscopy Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Influence of intracanal moisture on dentinal tubule infiltration of a calcium silicate-containing resin-based sealer assessed with confocal laser scanning microscopy.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of root canal moisture on intratubular penetration of bioceramic sealer using two obturation techniques: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Article
- Correlation of Bond Strength and Dentinal Tubule Penetration Evaluation of Four Different Endodontic Sealers: AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, Endoseal MTA, and Endoseal TCS (Maruchi): An In Vitro Study.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The sealer's penetration into dentinal tubules creates a physical barrier that entombs any remaining bacteria and increases the surface contact with the root canal walls. This study aimed to evaluate the dentinal tubule penetration and push-out bond strength of four sealers and to assess the correlation between penetration depth and bond strength. Methods: In this in vitro study, 40 human single-rooted anterior teeth were divided into four groups based on the sealer type and obturated using the single cone technique. Three slices of 1 ± 0.1 mm thickness were then prepared from each tooth at three regions-coronal, middle, and apical thirds-perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the root. The depth and percentage of sealer penetration into the dentinal tubules were measured using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) on the prepared slices. To assess the bond strength of the sealers to dentin walls, a push-out bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using SPSS software through ANOVA, Tukey post hoc and Pearson's correlation tests. A Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in the extent and percentage of penetration, and the push-out bond strength of the studied sealers ( Conclusion: Calcium silicate-based sealers (Endoseal MTA and Endoseal TCS) achieved the greatest penetration, whereas AH Plus demonstrated the highest bond strength. The positive correlations observed suggest that dentinal tubule penetration may contribute to stronger bonding for specific sealers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.