Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41476818›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025

From complexity to commercial readiness: industry insights on bridging gaps in human-robot interaction and social robot navigation.

Lina Moe, Benjamin Greenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lina MoeBloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Benjamin GreenbergDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the evolving landscape of mobile robotics, focusing on challenges faced by roboticists working in industry when integrating robots into human-populated environments. Through interviews with sixteen industry professionals specializing in social mobile robotics, we examined two primary research questions: (1) What approaches to person detection and representation are used in industry? and (2) How does the relationship between industry and academia impact the research process? Our findings reveal diverse approaches to human detection, ranging from basic obstacle avoidance to advanced systems that differentiate among classes of humans. We suggest that robotic system design overall and human detection in particular are influenced by whether researchers use a framework of safety or sociality, how they approach building complex systems, and how they develop metrics for success. Additionally, we highlight the gaps and synergies between industry and academic research, particularly regarding commercial readiness and the incorporation of human-robot interaction (HRI) principles into robotic development. This study underscores the importance of addressing the complexities of social navigation in real-world settings and suggests that strengthening avenues of communication between industry and academia will help to shape a sustainable role for robots in the physical and social world.

Indexed as

industryinterviewmobile robotsnavigationperson detectionqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41476818
PMCPMC12747840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.