Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41476760›Full record

ReviewJSES international2026

Risk factors for postage stamp fracture following arthroscopic Bankart repair: a systematic review.

Jakob Oury, Srikanth Mudiganty, Alexander Crowley, Brian Godshaw

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jakob OuryUniversity of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Srikanth MudigantyOchsner Andrews Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, LA, USA.
Alexander CrowleyOchsner Andrews Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, LA, USA.
Brian GodshawOchsner Andrews Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, LA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postage stamp fractures are a rare but considerable complication after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Previous literature has implicated various patient- and technique-specific factors, but analyses often lacked comparison to the broader operative sample. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature on postage stamp fracture after arthroscopic Bankart repair, evaluate patient- and anchor-specific risk factors, and contextualize findings within the full operative sample. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies reporting postage stamp fractures following arthroscopic Bankart repair using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Patient demographics, anchor characteristics, and surgical outcomes were extracted. Risk factor associations were evaluated descriptively, with emphasis on whether reported associations held true across the full sample of surgical cases in each study. Results: A systematic search yielded 2,349 articles; after duplicate removal and screening, 7 studies met inclusion criteria (2 comparative, 5 noncomparative). Studies included a total of 1,264 patients aged 10-61, with fracture incidence in larger cohorts ranging from 1.58% to 5%. Most patients with fractures participated in sports, particularly contact or high-risk activities. Although male patients made up the majority of fracture cases, this reflected the underlying demographic of operative patients. Patients with fractures were often the same age or older than the overall sample. Anchor number, diameter, type, and material were variably reported. Average anchor count was not consistently higher in patients with fractures, and no study found a significant association between anchor quantity and fracture risk. Absorbable anchors were implicated in a higher proportion of fracture cases. Osteolysis was common among patients with fractures. Insertion angle and suture type (knotted vs. knotless) were inconsistently reported and not clearly linked to fracture incidence. Conclusion: Male sex and younger age, previously identified as risk factors, were not associated with postage stamp fractures when contextualized within the full operative sample. Presence of osteolysis and athletic participation was consistently associated with postage stamp fracture and may represent meaningful risk factors. Contrary to earlier reports, higher anchor quantity was not associated with increased postage stamp fracture risk; instead, lower anchor counts may be linked to instability, which itself may predispose to postage stamp fracture. Use of absorbable anchors emerged as a potential contributor to fracture risk that warrants further research.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyBankart lesionFracturesRisk factorsShoulder dislocationSuture anchors

Identifiers

PMID41476760
PMCPMC12753225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.