SynthesisBioMed research international2025
The Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Bone Mineral Density at Specific Anatomical Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Bone Mineral Density at Specific Anatomical Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There have been some concerns about the potential adverse consequences of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on bone health, specifically with respect to bone mineral density (BMD). The objective of the present investigation was to evaluate the impact of PPIs on BMD in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip regions. On the basis of PRISMA, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were used to find eligible observational studies published between January 2010 and January 2025. The ROBINS-I tool was employed to evaluate potential for bias, and studies with critical bias were excluded. To synthesize the data, random-effects models were utilized, and the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.