ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2026
Improving MASLD Risk Stratification in Young Adults with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Insulin Resistance Assessment.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving MASLD Risk Stratification in Young Adults with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Insulin Resistance Assessment.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: The fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) index is recommended to identify adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and clinically significant fibrosis (moderate to advanced fibrosis or ≥F2). However, it is less reliable in young adults (age <45 years). Objective: The aim was to assess whether cardiometabolic risk factors [CMRFs: type 2 diabetes (T2D), hypertension, obesity] or insulin resistance (IR) improved MASLD fibrosis risk stratification in young adults. Methods: Adults with/without T2D and no history of MASLD attending outpatient clinics underwent screening with vibration-controlled transient elastography for ≥F2 (liver stiffness measurement ≥ 8.0 kPa). Magnetic resonance elastography and/or liver biopsy were performed if indicated for diagnosis confirmation. Results: Of the 964 adults, 25% were young adults and 75% were 45 to 64 years, with the prevalence of ≥F2: 7% vs 9% ( Conclusion: In young adults, the absence of CMRFs or IR makes clinically significant fibrosis unlikely. Measuring IR improved risk stratification in young adults with CMRFs. Using CMRFs with IR may improve the detection of clinically significant fibrosis in young adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.