ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Feasibility of smart ring-based remote monitoring in hospitalized patients: evaluation of signal transmission latency and data acquisition continuity.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: General wards rely on intermittent vital-sign checks, creating blind spots for deterioration detection under staffing constraints. While wearable sensors promise continuous ward-scale monitoring, real-world feasibility remains uncertain because prior studies emphasized signal accuracy rather than the timeliness and low-latency continuous monitoring system. This study addresses that gap by quantifying transmission latency and signal acquisition rate (SAR) of a ring-based system in routine surgical-ward care. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of 128 adult postoperative inpatients monitored with a finger-worn smart ring (CART-1 plus) from 23 December 2024 to 20 July 2025. Signals streamed via BLE to a dedicated receiver and hospital Wi-Fi. Primary endpoints were (i) transmission latency (device timestamp→server receipt) and (ii) SAR. Cached burst uploads at 0-1-s intervals were excluded from latency analyses. Prespecified acceptability thresholds were ≤10 min for BP latency, ≤5 min for SpO Results: Mean transmission latency was 7.23 min (BP) and 4.35 min (SpO Conclusion: In real-world surgical wards, a finger-worn ring achieved clinically acceptable transmission latency and high continuity, supporting feasibility for a low-latency continuous monitoring system. Findings identify modifiable environmental and patient-level factors that influence latency and can guide scale-up and integration with early-warning workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.