Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41476681›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric cardiology : JGC2025

Performance of angiographic quantitative flow ratio in guiding coronary interventions across different age groups: prespecified subgroup analysis of the FAVOR III China trial.

Xin-Ye Xu, Li-Yun He, Chang-Dong Guan, Ming Cui, Yu-Peng Wang, Yu-Jie Zhou, Jian-An Wang, Jun Bu, Liang-Long Chen, Xin-Kai Qu and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Xin-Ye XuDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, NHC Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Molecular Biology and Regulatory Peptides, Beijing, China.
Li-Yun HeDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, NHC Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Molecular Biology and Regulatory Peptides, Beijing, China.
Chang-Dong GuanDepartment of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Clinical Research Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ming CuiDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, NHC Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Molecular Biology and Regulatory Peptides, Beijing, China.
Yu-Peng WangDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, NHC Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Molecular Biology and Regulatory Peptides, Beijing, China.
Yu-Jie ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jian-An WangDepartment of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jun BuDepartment of Cardiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Liang-Long ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xin-Kai QuDepartment of Cardiology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jun-Qing YangDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yan-Yan ZhaoMedical Research and Biometrics Centre, National Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Xue-Bo LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Cheng-Xing ShenDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Sheng-Xian TuBiomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Gregg StoneThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.
Li-Jun GuoDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, NHC Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Molecular Biology and Regulatory Peptides, Beijing, China.
Lei SongDepartment of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Clinical Research Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) based lesion selection for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment has shown clinical benefits in terms of reduced risk for myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization. Whether this benefit is consistent across different age groups still needs further investigation. Methods: In this prespecified subgroup study of FAVOR III China trial, we compared long-term clinical outcomes between QFR-guided and angiography-guided PCI among different age groups among 3825 enrolled subjects. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization. Results: Of the 3825 patients, 1717 (44.9%) were aged ≥ 65 years. At baseline, patients ≥ 65 had higher rates of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, stroke history ( Conclusions: Although with higher rate of comorbidities and more complex coronary anatomy, the long-term benefit of the QFR-guided PCI strategy remained consistent in patients ≥ 65 years, compared with those < 65 years.

Identifiers

PMID41476681
PMCPMC12747850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.