Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41476675›Full record

ArticleTracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.)2025

Just Culture in a Fragmented System: Ethical and Quality Imperatives in Cross-Institutional Tracheostomy Care.

Ruby J Kazemi, Isabel Snee, Nicholas R Lenze, Norman D Hogikyan, Vinciya Pandian, Michael J Brenner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruby J KazemiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Isabel SneeSchool of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA.
Nicholas R LenzeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Norman D HogikyanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Vinciya PandianRoss and Nese College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2260-1080
Michael J BrennerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4926-0957

Funding

AHRQ HHS R18 HS029124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the ethical imperative to respond to medical errors that cause patient harm is well established, reporting errors that span institutional boundaries introduces added ethical, professional, and practical challenges. This article examines these tensions through the fictitious case of a patient who had repeated tracheostomy dislodgement, highlighting the responsibilities of healthcare professionals to maintain transparency, foster trust, and promote systemic quality improvement. While disclosing errors to patients and families is widely recognized as essential to ethical and patient-centered care, reporting mistakes made by colleagues, especially across healthcare systems, raises issues of professional responsibility, institutional accountability, and medicolegal risk. Healthcare professionals must navigate considerations of individual accountability versus systemic failure to support a culture of learning. In high-risk settings such as tracheostomy care, adverse events often arise from both human error and systemic deficiencies, underscoring the need for structured reporting mechanisms that support ethical disclosure, interprofessional communication, and data-driven quality improvement. This discussion highlights the evolving expectations for professional self-regulation, the role of structured feedback in improving care, and the ethical imperative to protect future patients while maintaining fairness to colleagues. Advancing patient safety is thus predicated on strengthening institutional policies and fostering a culture of accountability without instilling fear or inappropriately attributing blame. A just culture approach, emphasizing learning, transparency, and systemic improvement, provides a pathway to reconciling ethical obligations with practical solutions, ensuring the highest standards of care.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareDisclosureHealth CommunicationInterprofessional RelationsMedical ErrorsMedical EthicsOrganizational CulturePatient SafetyQuality ImprovementTracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID41476675
PMCPMC12752776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.