ArticleTracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.)2025
Just Culture in a Fragmented System: Ethical and Quality Imperatives in Cross-Institutional Tracheostomy Care.
Article in Tracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing Equity in Tracheostomy Care with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Tracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the ethical imperative to respond to medical errors that cause patient harm is well established, reporting errors that span institutional boundaries introduces added ethical, professional, and practical challenges. This article examines these tensions through the fictitious case of a patient who had repeated tracheostomy dislodgement, highlighting the responsibilities of healthcare professionals to maintain transparency, foster trust, and promote systemic quality improvement. While disclosing errors to patients and families is widely recognized as essential to ethical and patient-centered care, reporting mistakes made by colleagues, especially across healthcare systems, raises issues of professional responsibility, institutional accountability, and medicolegal risk. Healthcare professionals must navigate considerations of individual accountability versus systemic failure to support a culture of learning. In high-risk settings such as tracheostomy care, adverse events often arise from both human error and systemic deficiencies, underscoring the need for structured reporting mechanisms that support ethical disclosure, interprofessional communication, and data-driven quality improvement. This discussion highlights the evolving expectations for professional self-regulation, the role of structured feedback in improving care, and the ethical imperative to protect future patients while maintaining fairness to colleagues. Advancing patient safety is thus predicated on strengthening institutional policies and fostering a culture of accountability without instilling fear or inappropriately attributing blame. A just culture approach, emphasizing learning, transparency, and systemic improvement, provides a pathway to reconciling ethical obligations with practical solutions, ensuring the highest standards of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.