ArticleInternational journal of breast cancer2025
Extensive Intraductal Component (EIC) as the Most Predictive Factor for Residual Disease Post-Breast-Conserving Surgery With Close DCIS Margins: A Single Institutional Experience.
Article in International journal of breast cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extensive Intraductal Component (EIC) as the Most Predictive Factor for Residual Disease Post-Breast-Conserving Surgery With Close DCIS Margins: A Single Institutional Experience.International journal of breast cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We set out to assess whether the extensive intraductal component (EIC) status in invasive breast cancers serves as an independent predictor of residual disease (RD) in re-excisions performed at our institution. This laboratory-based study provides insights into the thresholds for additional surgical intervention in cases with close ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) margins following initial breast-conserving surgery (BCS). We also examined the unique characteristics specific to EIC-positive cases. Methods: BCS cases with invasive breast cancer and DCIS with close margins that had re-excisions following initial surgery (Dec 2019-Dec 2024) were selected and classified into EIC positive or EIC negative. Data collected on the initial excision included the EIC status and other clinicopathological information such as margin status, DCIS extent, cancer type and focality, TNM stage, biomarker status, and OncotypeDX Recurrence Score (RS). The RD status was collected on re-excision specimens. Results: Ninety-one cases were included (57 EIC positive and 34 EIC negative), with most being invasive ductal carcinoma. The rate of RD on re-excision was 70.2% and 32.4% in EIC-positive and EIC-negative cases, respectively ( Conclusion: Findings show that EIC status is the most significant predictor of RD following BCSs with close DCIS margins. This emphasizes the importance of identifying EIC-positive cases in pathology reports and prioritizing them for additional re-excision when DCIS margins are close.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.