ArticleIDCases2026
Probiotic paradox: Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia after S. boulardii use in severe pancreatitis.
Article in IDCases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Saccharomyces boulardii is a widely used probiotic for managing antibiotic-associated diarrhea and other gastrointestinal disorders. While considered safe in immunocompetent individuals, its use in critically ill patients has been increasingly associated with invasive fungal infections, particularly Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia. Case presentation: We report the case of a 46-year-old male admitted with severe necrotizing biliary pancreatitis, complicated by pancreatic necrosis, portal vein thrombosis, and a suspected duodenal fistula. Following emergency necrosectomy, the patient required prolonged ICU care with enteral and parenteral nutrition via jejunostomy and central venous catheter. On postoperative day 7, he developed watery diarrhoea and was started on S. boulardii (Econorm) probiotics. By day 14, he developed high-grade fever, hypotension, and leucocytosis. Blood cultures from both central and peripheral lines grew S. cerevisiae, confirmed by MALDI-TOF. The isolate was sensitive to amphotericin B, fluconazole, and caspofungin. The probiotic was discontinued, central line removed, and caspofungin initiated, resulting in clinical improvement and sterile follow-up cultures. Discussion and conclusion: Though rare, fungemia due to S. boulardii can be life-threatening, particularly in ICU settings where multiple risk factors coexist. Proposed mechanisms include gut translocation and catheter contamination during probiotic handling. This case underscores the need for caution in using yeast-based probiotics in critically ill patients. Lactobacillus-based formulations are safer alternatives. Strict infection control, microbiology communication, and heightened clinical awareness are essential to mitigate risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.