Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41476557›Full record

ReviewACS omega2025

A Review of Electrically Enhanced Oil Recovery (EEOR): Mechanism, Influencing Factors and Field Application Effects.

Dongyue Zhang, Qingjie Liu, Xinyu Zhou, Xiuxiu Pan, Jiale Shi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dongyue ZhangUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5260-7333
Qingjie LiuInstitute of Porous Flow and Fluid Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Langfang 065007, China.
Xinyu ZhouResearch Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China.
Xiuxiu PanUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9226-3843
Jiale ShiUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic review of electrically enhanced oil recovery (EEOR), focusing on the critical gap between its promising laboratory performance and the slow pace of industrial deployment. First, the current state of EEOR applications is reviewed. Although extensive laboratory research has confirmed its technical feasibility, field applications remain mostly confined to pilot-scale projects, particularly in heavy oil and oil sands reservoirs. These trials demonstrate EEOR's potential to outperform conventional steam flooding in terms of recovery efficiency and energy utilization, but they also expose significant challengessuch as low reliability of downhole hardware (with failure rates reaching up to 75% in some projects), geomechanical instability, and operational difficultieshighlighting the technological gap between experimental success and large-scale reliability. Second, the review elucidates the fundamental mechanisms underlying EEOR. As a multiphysics coupled process, EEOR is governed by electrodynamic, electrothermal, and electrochemical effects. Key mechanisms include: electrodynamic effects (electroosmosis and electrophoresis), which provide nonpressure-driven flow forces; electrothermal effects (primarily Joule heating), which reduce heavy oil viscosity; and electrochemical effects (electrowetting and redox reactions), which alter wettability and enable in situ upgrading. A key insight is the inherent interplayboth antagonistic and synergisticamong these mechanisms, with reservoir water salinity serving as the central regulatory factor. The review further discusses emerging technologies, such as electromagnetic-assisted composite flooding and plasma pulse stimulation, emphasizing their potential for synergistic enhancement through multiphysics coupling. Third, economic and operational constraints are critically assessed. Although EEOR may offer energy cost advantages under specific conditions, its commercial viability is hindered by high electricity prices, substantial capital investment, and operational risks arising from equipment failures. Finally, this review outlines a forward-looking perspective. The advancement of EEOR depends on shifting the research focus from mechanism validation to resolving engineering bottlenecks. Future efforts should prioritize the development of highly reliable, long-lifetime downhole electrode and cable systems, the construction of quantitative models capable of predicting coupled multifield effects, and the integration of artificial intelligence for process optimization. Such an engineering-driven approach is essential for transforming EEOR from a promising laboratory concept into a practical, field-deployable technology.

Identifiers

PMID41476557
PMCPMC12750278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.