ReviewACS omega2025
A Review of Electrically Enhanced Oil Recovery (EEOR): Mechanism, Influencing Factors and Field Application Effects.
Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a systematic review of electrically enhanced oil recovery (EEOR), focusing on the critical gap between its promising laboratory performance and the slow pace of industrial deployment. First, the current state of EEOR applications is reviewed. Although extensive laboratory research has confirmed its technical feasibility, field applications remain mostly confined to pilot-scale projects, particularly in heavy oil and oil sands reservoirs. These trials demonstrate EEOR's potential to outperform conventional steam flooding in terms of recovery efficiency and energy utilization, but they also expose significant challengessuch as low reliability of downhole hardware (with failure rates reaching up to 75% in some projects), geomechanical instability, and operational difficultieshighlighting the technological gap between experimental success and large-scale reliability. Second, the review elucidates the fundamental mechanisms underlying EEOR. As a multiphysics coupled process, EEOR is governed by electrodynamic, electrothermal, and electrochemical effects. Key mechanisms include: electrodynamic effects (electroosmosis and electrophoresis), which provide nonpressure-driven flow forces; electrothermal effects (primarily Joule heating), which reduce heavy oil viscosity; and electrochemical effects (electrowetting and redox reactions), which alter wettability and enable in situ upgrading. A key insight is the inherent interplayboth antagonistic and synergisticamong these mechanisms, with reservoir water salinity serving as the central regulatory factor. The review further discusses emerging technologies, such as electromagnetic-assisted composite flooding and plasma pulse stimulation, emphasizing their potential for synergistic enhancement through multiphysics coupling. Third, economic and operational constraints are critically assessed. Although EEOR may offer energy cost advantages under specific conditions, its commercial viability is hindered by high electricity prices, substantial capital investment, and operational risks arising from equipment failures. Finally, this review outlines a forward-looking perspective. The advancement of EEOR depends on shifting the research focus from mechanism validation to resolving engineering bottlenecks. Future efforts should prioritize the development of highly reliable, long-lifetime downhole electrode and cable systems, the construction of quantitative models capable of predicting coupled multifield effects, and the integration of artificial intelligence for process optimization. Such an engineering-driven approach is essential for transforming EEOR from a promising laboratory concept into a practical, field-deployable technology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.