ArticleACS omega2025
Primary Literature as the Course Design Centerpiece in a General Chemistry Course That Prepares Undergraduates for Research.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past several decades, research has become a key component of the undergraduate curriculum. Indeed, there have been considerable efforts to prepare undergraduates to engage in authentic research experiences with educators developing various curricular and pedagogical changes as the catalysts for effective preparation. However, most institutions elect to innovate in the major-level courses, while remaining committed to the traditional approach in general chemistry that was designed decades ago and took hold in the 1950s. It is our assertion that this outdated approach limits the ability of undergraduates to gain early access to research while also diminishing the learning gains experienced by students once they begin in their research endeavor. Therefore, in order to provide an alternative and potentially innovative approach to General Chemistry undergraduate education, we have explored the development of a combined lecture-laboratory course at the US Air Force Academy that emphasizes a research-forward, primary literature-based design to in lieu of the traditional textbook approach. This course emphasizes the extensive use of primary literature that is overtly connected to a series of experiments as the major emphasis in the course. As such, this course leans predominantly toward a laboratory-based method of instruction (∼70%). What follows is a description of a course, including methodology for changing the general chemistry curriculum from a course focused on distributing knowledge to one designed around introducing students to the academic chemical research process. This approach facilitates student learning relative to research, inquiry, and scientific reasoning, allowing such a curriculum format to be used for the achievement of relevant,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.