Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41476447›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of biomedical imaging2025

Alveolar Bone Segmentation Methods in Assessing the Effectiveness of Periodontal Defect Regeneration Through Machine Learning of CBCT Data: A Systematic Review.

Mahmud Mohammed, Tulio Fernandez-Medina, Manjunath Rajashekhar, Stephanie Baker, Ernest Jennings

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of biomedical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mahmud MohammedCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia, jcu.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3187-0717
Tulio Fernandez-MedinaCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia, jcu.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5659-7884
Manjunath RajashekharCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia, jcu.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5218-250X
Stephanie BakerCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia, jcu.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0467-7791
Ernest JenningsCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia, jcu.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8912-6894

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate various segmentation methods used for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of alveolar bone, assessing their effectiveness and potential benefits in digital workflows for periodontal defect regeneration. Data: This review adheres to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) Checklist. Source: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2024 to June 2025 using MeSH terms on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Medline databases, with publication date restricted to 5 years. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to ensure a systematic review process, and the review protocol was registered with Prospero. The QUADAS-2 checklist was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies. Study Selection: The initial search yielded 834 articles, which were systematically filtered down to 23 eligible studies. Deep learning methods, particularly U-Net, were the most frequently employed segmentation techniques. Four studies utilized semi-automated methods, while the remaining studies relied on manual or other segmentation methods. The Dice similarity (DC) index, ranging from 76% to 98%, was the primary metric used to assess segmentation performance. Conclusions: Significant differences were observed between the segmentation of healthy and defective alveolar bone, underscoring the need to enhance deep learning-based methods. Accurate segmentation of periodontal defects in DICOM images is a crucial first step in the scaffold workflow, as it enables precise assessment of defect morphology and volume. This information directly informs scaffold design, ensuring that the scaffold geometry is tailored to the patient-specific defect. Prospero Registration: CRD42024590957.

Indexed as

alveolar bone segmentationartificial intelligenceCBCTdeep learningdigitalmachine learningsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41476447
PMCPMC12752843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.