ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Retrospective Evaluation of Transvaginal Sonography, Saline Infusion Sonography, and Hysterosalpingography for Detecting Endometrial Polyps in 256 Infertile Women.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate detection of endometrial polyps (EPs), a recognized cause of infertility, is essential prior to in vitro fertilization (IVF). This study compared the diagnostic performance of transvaginal sonography (TVS), hysterosalpingography (HSG), and saline infusion sonography (SIS) for EP detection. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study included 256 infertile women treated at Acıbadem Maslak Hospital IVF Unit between January 2022 and January 2024. All patients underwent TVS and HSG; SIS was performed in cases with suspected EP. Positive SIS findings were confirmed by diagnostic hysteroscopy, and excised specimens underwent pathological evaluation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Statistical comparisons were made using Cochran's Q test, McNemar's test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with DeLong's method. RESULTS The sensitivity and specificity were 60.6% and 52.6% for TVS, 66.8% and 32.0% for HSG, and 94.3% and 28.1% for SIS, respectively. SIS showed significantly higher sensitivity than TVS (P<0.01) and HSG (P<0.01). PPV/NPV were 81.2%/28.3% for TVS, 76.7%/22.0% for HSG, and 81.6%/59.3% for SIS. ROC analysis revealed area-under-the-curve values of 0.566 for TVS, 0.492 for HSG, and 0.612 for SIS, with SIS performing significantly better than HSG (P=0.018). Pathology confirmed that all polyps were functional, and no malignancy was detected. CONCLUSIONS SIS demonstrated the highest sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy, supporting its use as the most reliable non-invasive method for EP detection in infertile women prior to IVF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.