Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41476328›Full record

Observational studyJournal of paediatrics and child health2026

Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination at 3 Months in Infants at Risk for Congenital Infections: A Cohort Study.

Karen Cristine Oliveira de Azambuja, Amanda de Arguelho Oliveira Arguelho, Meyene Duque Weber, Lorrainy Marques da Silva Dutra, Tathiana Ghisi de Souza, Daniele Soares-Marangoni

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karen Cristine Oliveira de AzambujaGraduate Program in Movement Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3251-5634
Amanda de Arguelho Oliveira ArguelhoGraduate Program in Movement Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4075-9256
Meyene Duque WeberGraduate Program in Movement Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1001-840X
Lorrainy Marques da Silva DutraHealth Institute, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2101-7664
Tathiana Ghisi de SouzaPediatrics Department, Jundiaí Medical School, Jundiaí, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-1222
Daniele Soares-MarangoniGraduate Program in Movement Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5354-5456

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 404346/2023-5Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSTORCH refers to a group of congenital infections (syphilis, toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus and herpes) that can impact the central nervous system. As clinical signs may not appear until several months or years after birth, the early detection of risk in STORCH-exposed infants has been challenging, and the use of sensitive tools in this population is understudied.

objectiveTo compare STORCH-exposed infants with non-exposed controls using the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) at 3 months of age.

methodsThis is an observational cohort study. A total of 60 infants were included and equally allocated into two groups: an exposed group, whose mothers had a clinically confirmed diagnosis of a classic STORCH infection during pregnancy, and a non-exposed control group, whose mothers did not present STORCH infections during gestation. At 3 months of age (13.83 ± 1.09 weeks post-term), infants were assessed using the HINE. Group comparisons were performed for the global score, subscores across the five scorable domains (cranial nerve function, posture, spontaneous movements, tone and reflexes and reactions), number of asymmetries and risk of cerebral palsy.

resultsThe exposed group showed lower global scores and lower subscores in most HINE domains compared to controls, along with a higher frequency of asymmetries and an increased proportion of infants classified as at high risk for cerebral palsy.

conclusionInfants prenatally exposed to STORCH infections showed an increased risk of impairment based on the HINE when compared to controls. Potential neurological limitations were detectable in the exposed group at 3 months of age.

Indexed as

Neurologic ExaminationPregnancy Complications, InfectiousCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePregnancychild developmentinfantneurological examinationprenatal carerisk factors

Identifiers

PMID41476328
PMCPMC12976167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.