Trial reportScientific reports2025
Comparative analysis of low-dose letrozole versus GnRH agonist on implantation markers and IVF outcomes in symptomatic adenomyosis: a randomized trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Symptomatic adenomyosis is a known impediment to successful implantation and pregnancy in in vitro fertilization; yet optimal pre-treatment strategic approach remains uncertain. This randomized controlled trial compared the effects of low dose letrozole (2.5 mg, thrice weekly for three-months) and GnRH agonist (3.6 mg/month for three-months) on implantation markers and reproductive outcomes in 156 women with symptomatic diffuse adenomyosis undergoing frozen embryo transfer. Seventy-five women with tubal factor infertility served as controls. Endometrial biopsies during the implantation window were analyzed pre- and post-treatment for key receptivity markers via immunohistochemistry and ELISA. Women with adenomyosis exhibited higher BMI (p = 0.02) and basal estradiol (p = 0.03) than controls. No significant differences in clinical pregnancy (letrozole: 27.9%, GnRHa: 29.9%), live birth (letrozole: 17.7%, GnRHa: 19.5%), and miscarriage rates (letrozole: 22.7%, GnRHa: 21.7%) were observed between treatment groups. Notably, outer myometrial involvement was linked to higher odds of pregnancy outcome (OR 3.26, p = 0.01). Both treatment arms showed improved endometrial expression of PR and integrin αvβ3 (p < 0.01), along with significant downregulation (p < 0.001) of ERα, ERβ, VEGF, and eNOS, suggesting enhanced receptivity. These findings suggest that low dose letrozole may be a viable alternative to GnRHa, with lesion location serving as a critical determinant of reproductive success in adenomyosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.