ArticleScientific reports2025
Dexmedetomidine administration may be beneficial in relation to ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic and therapeutic implications of PSMD14 in hepatocellular carcinoma: an integrative analysis of transcriptomic and single-cell profiles.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of Dexmedetomidine (Dex) use on the prognosis of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a subject worthy of further investigation. This study seeks to evaluate the association between Dex administration and prognosis in critically ill patients with VAP. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV database, including adults (≥ 18 years) with VAP and ICU stays ≥ 24 h. Patients were divided into the DEX group and the non-DEX group based on Dex administration. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary endpoint was 90-day survival rate. We used multivariable logistic regression and propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for baseline imbalances. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed survival differences. Stratified analyses evaluated temporal trends (2008-2022), dosage (mcg/kg/h), and infusion duration (hours) to further validate the robustness of the results. This research included a total of 1766 VAP patients (DEX: n = 905; non-DEX: n = 861), Dex was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (unadjusted OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.44-0.69; adjusted OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47-0.83).The survival curve was calculated based on Kaplan-Meier analysis, which indicated that the DEX group exhibited a relatively longer survival time, and this difference was highly statistically significant (p < 0.001).It is worth mentioning that the mortality reduction remained robust across all sensitivity analyses, including PSM, temporal stratification, and dose-duration subgroups. Dex is associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality in VAP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.