ArticleScientific reports2025
Quantum annealing for inverse kinematics in robotics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We study a proof-of-concept workflow that reformulates planar inverse kinematics (IK) for robotic manipulators as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) using a linear binary discretization of joint angles and one-hot (big-M) constraints, and then solves the QUBO with quantum annealing on D-Wave hardware. We (i) define and report time-to-solution (TTS) rigorously, (ii) evaluate solution accuracy back in the original IK space via end-effector error and feasibility of one-hot constraints, and (iii) analyze embedding choices on Pegasus/Zephyr. On the tested two-link planar IK instances, Global Embedding on Zephyr uses fewer physical qubits and yields shorter access times than alternatives (see Tables 1,2), and a hybrid quantum-classical solver achieves lower TTS than classical QUBO baselines at larger Q sizes (see Figure 6). These results do not claim superiority over state-of-the-art continuous IK solvers; rather, they demonstrate that an IK-to-QUBO mapping can be executed on current quantum annealing systems with quantified accuracy and runtime, clarifying where such an approach may be useful as hardware improves.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.