ArticleScientific reports2025
New design of plate implant for bone healing assessment using frequency measurement: a biomechanical cadaveric study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study is a biomechanical cadaveric investigation to assess bone healing by measuring frequency changes using a new plate design called bone union detection with wire’s natural frequency (BUDWF). Based on natural frequency and strain theory, in bone fracture conditions, the plate experiences higher strain under axial load and generates higher frequency, compared to the bone union condition where strain is lower and frequency is lower. If frequency changes can be detected, they can be used to determine the bone healing status. Eight human cadaveric tibia bones were used in the experiment. Bone union and fracture with a 10 mm gap, fixed by the BUDWF plate, were tested under various axial loads (0 N, 100 N, 200 N, 300 N, and 400 N) using the “Instron Electropuls E10000”. We found that the frequency did not significantly change with any axial loads in bone healing, which is different from the bone fracture where the frequency was higher under high axial load. When comparing the two bone conditions, there were significant differences in frequency change under axial loads of 200, 300, and 400 N (p < 0.001). From the result, The BUDWF plate with frequency measurement can assess bone healing by comparing the frequency changes from the bone fracture and the bone union condition under an axial load of 400 N. We hope this plate will be the prototype for developing the device to help bone healing detection in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.