Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41476174›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Potentiators empower synthetic microbiomes as silent guardians against co-contamination.

Zhepu Ruan, Jialin Tan, Qingyu Feng, Kaiqing Yang, Danning Li, Yuanqing Chao, Peng Wang, Zhuobiao Ni, Jingjing Chen, Rongliang Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Characterization of defensome genes and mobile genetic Elements in different types of pasture soil agroecosystems from the Brazilian Amazon.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhepu Ruan *Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural & Rural Pollution Abatement and Environmental Safety, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7713-9399
Jialin Tan *Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural & Rural Pollution Abatement and Environmental Safety, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4544-1024
Qingyu FengGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural & Rural Pollution Abatement and Environmental Safety, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4030-3739
Kaiqing YangGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural & Rural Pollution Abatement and Environmental Safety, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4990-9364
Danning LiGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural & Rural Pollution Abatement and Environmental Safety, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuanqing ChaoSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0534-346X
Peng WangSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0856-0865
Zhuobiao NiGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural & Rural Pollution Abatement and Environmental Safety, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5072-5478
Jingjing ChenGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural & Rural Pollution Abatement and Environmental Safety, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Rongliang QiuGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural & Rural Pollution Abatement and Environmental Safety, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China. qiurl@scau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9469-5274

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental co-contamination presents significant challenges. To tackle these, while microbial consortia offer advantages over single-strain, such as functional redundancy and synergistic degradation, rationally designing effective synthetic microbiomes for complex co-contamination scenarios remains a major challenge. Here, we utilize our advanced genome-scale metabolic modeling (GSMM) tool, SuperCC, to simulate the metabolic behavior of communities consisting of six isolated key strains under single- and multi-carbon source conditions, mimicking single-pollutant or co-contamination scenarios respectively. By integrating multi-omics data with metabolic modeling of cultures, we systematically elucidate key strain interaction networks and adaptive strategies under co-contamination. This reveal that the specific secretory products of broad-spectrum resource-utilizing bacteria serve as key metabolites driving cooperation and highlight the pivotal role of indigenous keystone strains in stabilizing and enhancing community function. Consequently, we propose an innovative and rational paradigm for consortium design: DHP-Com (Degrader-Helper-Potentiator Consortium). Potentiators are top species with stable habitat abundance. Synthetic microbiomes built on this framework exhibit enhanced ecological fitness and substantially improve remediation performance across diverse co-contamination scenarios. Our findings advanced the practical application of GSMM predictions to decipher intricate multi-pollutant/multi-strain interaction networks, offering a powerful rational framework and robust methodological tools for engineering multi-functional and effective synthetic microbiomes for complex environmental remediation.

Indexed as

BacteriaEnvironmental PollutionMicrobial ConsortiaMicrobiotaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID41476174
PMCPMC12858907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.