ReviewSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
Neurobiological illness models of schizophrenia and stigma reduction: has that ship sailed?
Review in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stigma substantially contributes to the burden of psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. Previous attempts to reduce stigma based on neurobiological illness models were unsuccessful. In this Perspective article, we argue that these models may have failed to reduce stigma in schizophrenia because of their lack of explanatory power and their connotations of biological otherness and determinism. We suggest that recent developments in the realm of computational psychiatry may help to remedy this situation. In particular, we discuss the potential of predictive processing, a highly influential computational framework of brain function, to reduce the stigma associated with schizophrenia. We argue that predictive processing accounts may do so by bridging the explanatory gap between biology and psychotic experiences within a normative theory of brain function, thus offering a normalizing perspective on the neural underpinnings of schizophrenia. This may facilitate not only a better understanding of psychotic experiences but also counteract connotations of biological determinism and foster belief in change. Viewing schizophrenia through the lens of predictive processing may thus pave the way for the integration of neurobiologically grounded models into the communication with patients, their relatives, and the public, which have the potential to reduce stigma.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.