Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41476167›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

Neurobiological illness models of schizophrenia and stigma reduction: has that ship sailed?

Philipp Sterzer, Nicolai Rohner, Christian Huber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philipp SterzerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. philipp.sterzer@upk.ch.
Nicolai RohnerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Christian HuberDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stigma substantially contributes to the burden of psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. Previous attempts to reduce stigma based on neurobiological illness models were unsuccessful. In this Perspective article, we argue that these models may have failed to reduce stigma in schizophrenia because of their lack of explanatory power and their connotations of biological otherness and determinism. We suggest that recent developments in the realm of computational psychiatry may help to remedy this situation. In particular, we discuss the potential of predictive processing, a highly influential computational framework of brain function, to reduce the stigma associated with schizophrenia. We argue that predictive processing accounts may do so by bridging the explanatory gap between biology and psychotic experiences within a normative theory of brain function, thus offering a normalizing perspective on the neural underpinnings of schizophrenia. This may facilitate not only a better understanding of psychotic experiences but also counteract connotations of biological determinism and foster belief in change. Viewing schizophrenia through the lens of predictive processing may thus pave the way for the integration of neurobiologically grounded models into the communication with patients, their relatives, and the public, which have the potential to reduce stigma.

Identifiers

PMID41476167
PMCPMC12868759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.