ArticleScientific reports2025
A multi-objective optimization framework integrating ICSL deep learning for forecasting and scheduling emergency medical supply demand in public health emergencies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Genome-wide association study of frailty and integrative functional analysis to elucidate its relationship with aging.GeroScience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the prediction and allocation challenges of emergency medical supplies during the middle and late stages of major outbreaks, we proposed an end-to-end ICSL deep learning algorithm architecture. This approach takes into account the characteristics of infectious diseases and the impact of government quarantine measures on their spread, enabling the prediction of the maximum demand for emergency medical supplies. Based on this, a multi-objective scheduling and allocation model was constructed, considering urgency, scheduling time, and cost. We designed a multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm to solve this model. Finally, we validated the algorithm using data from the Wuhan pandemic control measures. The results showed that the parameter update method improved the prediction accuracy of the LSTM model, increasing accuracy by 29.37% compared to the traditional LSTM algorithm and by 8.63% compared to the improved BP neural network algorithm. The proposed scheduling and allocation model optimizes delivery timeliness while also considering the urgency and cost-effectiveness of the resource allocation. The research findings can provide decision-making insights for the allocation of emergency medical supplies during public health emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.