ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
A full-automated tumor budding annotation approach in hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images of colorectal cancer.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and efficient grade assessment of tumor budding (TB) in hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images (H&E-stained WSIs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) remains challenging. This study proposes a full-automated TB annotation approach to assist in manual grade assessment by extracting tumor invasive front boundaries, annotating TBs in tumor invasive front patches, and transferring annotations to WSIs. Our approach demonstrates exceptional performance in tumor invasive front boundary extraction, achieving AUCs of 0.988, 0.921, and 0.929 on three different validation datasets. For TB annotations in tumor invasive front patches, the approach shows better recalls of 0.850, 0.753, and 0.720 on the same datasets. The average time of TB grade assisted by the approach in each WSI from different datasets is limited to 21 s, 15 s, and 18 s, respectively. These results demonstrate that this approach significantly improves assessment efficiency while guaranteeing accuracy, offering a reliable tool for CRC clinicopathological diagnosis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.