ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning reveals drivers of cold-related illness during energy infrastructure attacks in Wartime Ukraine.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, targeted attacks on energy infrastructure exposed civilians to heightened cold-related health risks. This study aimed to: (1) characterize respiratory infections and cold-related injuries during the conflict; (2) identify vulnerable sociodemographic groups; (3) assess household adaptations; and (4) evaluate how winter preparation influenced health outcomes. We surveyed 2311 households across 24 Ukrainian oblasts during the winter of 2022–2023. One adult per household provided data on demographics, winter preparations, housing, heating, and access to services. Machine learning models were used to predict respiratory infections, symptoms, and cold injuries, based on sociodemographic and household factors. Respiratory infections affected 75.2% of participants, and 3.76% reported cold injuries, rising to 10% among older adults. Larger households experienced more respiratory infections, while areas under Russian control reported higher rates of cold injury. Key predictors of respiratory infections included age, household size, financial stability, and heating practices; cold injuries were predicted by age, region, anxiety, and household size. This is the first study to apply machine learning in examining the health impacts of cold-related events following energy infrastructure attacks in an active conflict zone. Our findings underscore the vulnerability of older adults and the widespread burden of respiratory infections, highlighting the need for targeted cold injury prevention in conflict-affected and cold-climate regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.