ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting pathological complete response to breast cancer neoadjuvant therapy using multi-combination machine learning models based on vision transformer features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in hand surgery].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The significance of multi-combination machine learning models utilizing vision transformer (VIT) features in forecasting pathological complete response (pCR) after breast cancer neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). A retrospective study was conducted on 124 breast cancer patients who were confirmed by biopsy pathology and underwent surgical resection after NAT to evaluate pCR, and they were divided into a training cohort (n = 87) and a validation cohort (n = 37). Deep learning features were extracted from pre-biopsy ultrasound images based on VIT, ResNet50, and VGG16 convolutional neural network algorithms. Based on the Wilcoxon test, 9, 7, and 7 high-value features were identified from VIT, Resnet50, and VGG16 features, respectively. Using 12 machine learning algorithms, 111, 87, and 82 models were developed utilizing VIT, Resnet50, and VGG16 features. The Stepglm [forward], NaiveBayes, and glmBoost + Ridge ensemble algorithms achieved the highest area under the curve (AUCs). In both the training and validation cohorts, the AUCs of the optimal algorithms were: 0.872 and 0.839 for VIT, 0.837 and 0.804 for Resnet50, and 0.835 and 0.804 for VGG16. The predictive models developed based on VIT features have higher values in evaluating NAT-pCR for breast cancer compared to features quantified by other deep learning algorithms. The application of multi-combination models allows for the selection of the optimal algorithm to achieve higher prediction performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.