ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring the pangenome of Mycoplasma hyorhinis in search of potential virulence markers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ocular community state types reveal distinct microbial compositions among microbiomes with implications for trachoma control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mycoplasma hyorhinis (homotypic synonym of Mesomycoplasma hyorhinis) is a pathobiont from the upper respiratory tract of pigs. Under unclear circumstances, it can disseminate systemically and cause disease. Although some studies have reported different infectious capabilities among strains, no factors have been directly linked to virulence. This study aimed to analyze the core and accessory genes of all available M. hyorhinis strains (pangenome) to identify potential virulence markers. We characterized the pangenome of 110 strains, including isolates from healthy (nasal cavity) and diseased (systemic organs, nasal cavity or lung) animals. Comparative analyses were performed according to the clinical background. Although most putative virulence genes were shared, we identified several genes absent in most health-associated strains related to DNA-processing mechanisms, including hsdM-hsdR restriction-modification system and various helicases. Furthermore, the particular analysis of variable lipoprotein (vlp) genes revealed a similar presence in all strains but higher number of repeats in region III of vlpF in strains isolated from systemic lesions. Genome-scale metabolic models were used to infer the metabolic capabilities of the strains, showing highly conserved predicted reactomes, including growth capabilities and auxotrophies. In conclusion, although all strains may carry genes enabling disease, nasal strains from healthy animals lacked some DNA-processing genes and showed distinct vlp patterns. Additional genomes, especially from strains isolated from healthy animals, would be needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.