ArticleScientific reports2025
Fast electromagnetic field simulation using a current-density- based physics-informed neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Vascular Immunometabolism in Atherosclerosis: Emerging Roles of Glycometabolic Reprogramming in Immune and Vascular Cells.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Unmasking the cognitive burden of adult tuberculous meningitis: A systematic review and meta analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of open and laparoscopic groin hernia repair in elderly patients or octogenarians, an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Unraveling RELA as a potential dioctyl terephthalate-related target regulates M2-like macrophages to induce an immunosuppressive microenvironment in colorectal cancer: a multi-omics data study by experimental validation.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Empowered Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Materials: From Forward Prediction to Generative Inverse Design.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Rho/PAK signaling: a key driver of anthracycline and taxane resistance in breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- Comparative performance of traditional and commercial DNA extraction methods for fish gut microbiota analysis.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the realm of electromagnetic field simulation and in solving current density-related issues, traditional numerical methods are often hindered by inefficiencies and limited adaptability. This study introduces a physics-informed neural network (PINN) model predicated on current density, addressing the shortcomings of conventional Poisson equation solvers and enhancing computational efficacy and flexibility. By harnessing the synergies between physical-mathematical insights and deep learning, we have constructed a neural network model imbued with a priori knowledge of physics and mathematics, thereby facilitating an efficient resolution of the Poisson's equation. The model is evaluated in two distinct scenarios: simulating electromagnetic pulses generated by laser-target interactions and calculating the electric field for field-circuit coupling integration. The empirical results indicate that the PINN-based solution methodology not only achieves a remarkable acceleration in computation speed but also maintains commendable accuracy, and the relative error is less than 1.4%, while bolstering adaptability to variations in current density. This research not only presents a novel and potent tool for addressing electromagnetic field simulation and current density challenges but also underscores the broad applicative potential of PINN in the domains of electromagnetic field simulation and potential forecasting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.