Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41476089›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Fast electromagnetic field simulation using a current-density- based physics-informed neural network.

Zhiwei Gao, Cheng-An Sun, Zibin Ma, Zhijie Liu, Li Zhao, Qingmin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Unmasking the cognitive burden of adult tuberculous meningitis: A systematic review and meta analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhiwei GaoSchool of Information Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, China. gao_zhiwei@163.com.
Cheng-An SunHebei Province Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Environment Effects and Information Processing, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Zibin MaThe school of Intelligent Manufacturing, Hebei Vocational University of Industry and Technology, Hebei, China.
Zhijie LiuSchool of Traffic and Transportation, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Li ZhaoSchool of Traffic and Transportation, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Qingmin WangHebei Province Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Environment Effects and Information Processing, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, China.

Funding

the Major Scientific and Technological Projects of Universities in Hebei Province 241130467A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the realm of electromagnetic field simulation and in solving current density-related issues, traditional numerical methods are often hindered by inefficiencies and limited adaptability. This study introduces a physics-informed neural network (PINN) model predicated on current density, addressing the shortcomings of conventional Poisson equation solvers and enhancing computational efficacy and flexibility. By harnessing the synergies between physical-mathematical insights and deep learning, we have constructed a neural network model imbued with a priori knowledge of physics and mathematics, thereby facilitating an efficient resolution of the Poisson's equation. The model is evaluated in two distinct scenarios: simulating electromagnetic pulses generated by laser-target interactions and calculating the electric field for field-circuit coupling integration. The empirical results indicate that the PINN-based solution methodology not only achieves a remarkable acceleration in computation speed but also maintains commendable accuracy, and the relative error is less than 1.4%, while bolstering adaptability to variations in current density. This research not only presents a novel and potent tool for addressing electromagnetic field simulation and current density challenges but also underscores the broad applicative potential of PINN in the domains of electromagnetic field simulation and potential forecasting.

Indexed as

Current densityDeep learningFinite difference methodPhysics-informed neural network (PINN)Poisson’s equation

Identifiers

PMID41476089
PMCPMC12830955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.