ArticleScientific reports2025
Raman spectroscopy as an alternative approach for prediction of silicate mineral content in sedimentary rocks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work presents Raman spectroscopy as an alternative approach for rapid prediction of silicate mineral content in sedimentary rocks. Raman spectra of clay shale and claystone samples were measured by dispersive Raman spectrometer using the excitation laser wavelength of 633 nm. Due to the presence of strong fluorescence and overlapping bands in Raman spectra of claystones and clay shales, partial least squares regression (PLSR) was employed as a multivariate calibration method for semi-quantitative estimation of silicate mineral content. The PLSR models were developed for four predominant silicate minerals of claystones and clay shales – chlorite, muscovite, quartz and albite. The correlation coefficients for calibration and validation samples were > 0.91 and > 0.84, respectively. The root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) ranged from 1.8 to 4.9 wt %. The developed PLSR models showed good predictive capabilities for control samples and the repeatability of measurements expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD) was < 20%. This approach has the potential to be used for rapid and non-destructive on-site estimation of chlorite, muscovite, quartz and albite content in samples of claystones and clay shales using mobile Raman instruments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.