ArticleScientific reports2025
High-resolution water footprints of major crops in China from cities to grids.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid population and economic growth have led to an increased demand for water and food, thereby exacerbating the water scarcity crisis. Therefore, an objective assessment of water usage in crop production is crucial for ensuring national food security and alleviating water scarcity. However, the city-scale crop production water footprint (CWF) in China remains incomplete, while grid-scale CWF data are plagued by the limitations of coarse crop statistics. To fill this knowledge gap, we propose a novel methodology for developing a high-resolution inventory of CWFs. Based on this methodology, we quantified the city-scale water footprint (WF) of three major crops (rice, wheat, and maize) in China and allocated the CWFs of individual cities to 3 km × 3 km grids through a top-down downscaling approach to create a high-resolution CWF inventory. The results show that the average annual CWF of the three crops from 2000 to 2020 was in the order of rice (2.50 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.