ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2025
Development of machine learning models to predict risk of hospitalisation and 90-day readmission among patients with cardiovascular risk factors using community health survey data.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging the black box: artificial intelligence in acute care needs greater interpretability and precision.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to predict all-cause hospital admissions and 90-day readmissions using structured, patient-reported survey data.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted between 3 July 2021 and 18 December 2022, among US adults aged ≥18 years with at least one cardiovascular risk factor. Participants were recruited through social media, community pharmacies and outpatient clinics. The final sample included 1318 participants. Primary outcomes were any all-cause hospitalisation and readmission within 90 days. Eight supervised ML models were trained using an 80:20 train-test split and 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), precision, recall, F1 score and calibration metrics. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values identified key predictors.
resultsAmong 1318 participants, 35.0% reported at least one hospitalisation and 10.4% reported a 90-day readmission. The Extra Trees (ET) model demonstrated the best performance across both outcomes. For hospitalisation, ET achieved an AUROC of 0.93, precision of 0.83 and recall of 0.87. For readmission, AUROC was 0.99 with precision of 0.95 and recall of 0.96. SHAP analysis identified heart disease, medication burden, race/ethnicity, employment and insurance status as the most influential predictors. DISCUSSION: Patient-reported data reflecting behavioural, social and clinical factors can predict hospitalisations with high accuracy, complementing traditional EHR-based models.
conclusionsIntegrating such patient-reported and behavioural data into electronic health records could enable earlier identification of high-risk individuals and support targeted, preventive interventions to improve healthcare outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.