Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41475827›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Assessment of culture of care in health services: a scoping review protocol.

Fernanda de Lira Nunes Paulino, Julia Gomes Fernandes Costa de Sant'Anna, Marina Gabriela Medeiros de Moura, Marcelo da Costa Viana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fernanda de Lira Nunes PaulinoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil fernanda.lira@ufrn.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2194-4599
Julia Gomes Fernandes Costa de Sant'AnnaNursing Department, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Marina Gabriela Medeiros de MouraDepartment of Public Health, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Marcelo da Costa VianaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe term 'culture of care' began to be used following the Francis Report in the UK in 2013. This concept involves three dimensions: personal care, leadership care and co-worker care. Personal care focuses on employees' attitudes and behaviours. Co-worker care relates to a sense of community, and leadership care relates to how employees perceive leaders and managers as caring individuals dedicated to ensuring the well-being of others. Previous studies investigating culture assessment tools used in the healthcare system reported that although organisations are increasingly using culture assessment instruments, there is a focus on assessing safety and quality cultures rather than on caring perspectives. This scoping review aims to map existing studies related to the assessment of culture of care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy will include four indexed databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences) and additional sources not retrieved with the adopted search strategy. The search strategy will be constructed using the controlled vocabulary in Health Sciences Descriptors, Medical Subject Headings and Emtree. Relevant articles in all languages, without restrictions related to date of publication, will be considered eligible for inclusion. Two independent researchers will select articles based on the inclusion criteria, and a third author will be consulted to establish consensus, if necessary. Data extraction will involve a form with information on the study characteristics, methodological issues and main results from the evidence sources. The extracted data will be analysed using descriptive and content analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required, as this review will use data from publicly available bibliographic sources. The results will be disseminated through publications in scientific journals and presentation of the evidence to interested parties. STUDY REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U9Q53).

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth ServicesOrganizational CultureHumansLeadershipResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicUnited KingdomHealth ServicesHealth WorkforcePatient Care Management

Identifiers

PMID41475827
PMCPMC13059849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.