Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41475820›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Digital support for chronic dyspnoea management in primary care: protocol for the BREATHE (Breathlessness Rapid Evaluation and Therapy) cluster randomised controlled trial.

Allison Martin, Anthony Paulo Sunjaya, Katrina Giskes, Zoe McKeough, Charlotte M Hespe, Clare Arnott, Laurent Billot, Anna Campain, Caroline Polak Scowcroft, Emily R Atkins and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Real Play Enhances Authenticity and Reduces Stress in Learning Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Allison MartinThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia ahumphries@georgeinstitute.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-1188
Anthony Paulo SunjayaThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2257-4374
Katrina GiskesThe University of Notre Dame Australia School of Medicine Sydney Campus, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2266-0336
Zoe McKeoughDiscipline of Physiotherapy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3657-7229
Charlotte M HespeThe University of Notre Dame Australia School of Medicine Sydney Campus, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4582-7728
Clare ArnottThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Laurent BillotThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4975-9793
Anna CampainThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1057-0085
Caroline Polak ScowcroftConsumer representative, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Emily R AtkinsThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Stephen JanThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Hayley A ScottPriority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, University of Newcastle School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3201-8825
Ai-Vee ChuaSchool of Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2040-8674
Christine R JenkinsThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2717-5647
BREATHE Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic dyspnoea is a prevalent symptom, and primary care is ideally placed to identify and manage it. However, chronic dyspnoea is under-reported by patients and can be a diagnostic dilemma for practitioners. A fully automated system of patient screening, coupled with a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that uses a validated and evidence-based dyspnoea algorithm, may improve detection, diagnosis and management of the condition. There is currently no CDSS validated for chronic dyspnoea diagnosis and management in primary care in Australia. The objectives of this study are to assess the clinical impact of a CDSS for chronic dyspnoea in primary care. We hypothesise that the use of the CDSS will lead to a clinically significant improvement in patient-reported dyspnoea scores, reduced time to diagnosis and healthcare costs at 12 months compared with standard care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The BREATHE study is an open-label, cluster-randomised controlled trial of standard of care compared with a CDSS. General practices (n=40) in metropolitan, regional/rural and rural/remote settings will be recruited and randomised equally to pre-screening for chronic dyspnoea and usual standard-of-care management or pre-screening TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial is registered at ANZCTR (ACTRN12624001451594). ANZCTR is a primary registry that meets the requirements of the ICMJE and is listed on the ICTRP Registry Network. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (iRECS6645) and complies with the National Health and Medical Research Council ethical guidelines. Participating practices and each GP will provide written, informed consent. All patients being screened will provide electronic informed consent. Results of the study will be disseminated through various forums, including peer-reviewed publications and presentation at national and international conferences. Following the study, participating practices will be provided with a summary of the findings of the study, together with a full copy of any publications and a plain language statement for participants, which will be made available in the practice reception area.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalDyspneaPrimary Health CareAlgorithmsAustraliaChronic DiseaseHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCardiovascular DiseaseClinical Decision-MakingPrimary CareRESPIRATORY MEDICINE (see Thoracic Medicine)

Identifiers

PMID41475820
PMCPMC13059914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.