Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41475808›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Ethnological study of birth timing decisions: a scoping review protocol.

Yagana Samim, Nicholas Spence

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yagana SamimDepartment of Sociology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada yagana.samim@mail.utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9994-0478
Nicholas SpenceDepartment of Sociology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9847-7266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBirth timing decisions, a type of reproductive decision-making (RDM), have yet to be explored in the RDM literature through an ethnological lens. Existing literature has generally observed reproductive decisions across broad racial categories, which has not allowed for a nuanced understanding of the cultural factors influencing birth timing decisions. This scoping review aims to answer the following questions: (1) How do different ethnic groups approach birth timing decisions? (1a) What METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review follows the protocol laid out in the extension of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis, for scoping reviews and will use thematic analysis[1]. Using four databases, Medline, Web of Science, the International Bibliography of the Social Sciences and Sociological Abstracts, original research articles have been captured using the attached search strategy, which contains key terms related to both the independent and dependent variables of interest. Results have been filtered to include only studies published in English within the last 20 years (2005 to present) and conducted in the USA. These criteria were implemented using a verified search string. Additional filters for human-only results were applied to the Medline search. All relevant publications have been imported to Covidence, where the authors will independently conduct title/abstract screening and full-text screening, as well as a thematic analysis of the extracted data from the remaining articles that meet the inclusion criteria. The authors aim to organise and synthesise all findings using the attached data extraction table (see supplemental documents). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study uses existing publications and therefore does not require ethics submission or review. We intend to publish our scoping review in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This scoping review protocol has been registered via Open Science Framework (OSF); the preregistration can be found at the following link: https://osf.io/6f4bq.

Indexed as

Birth IntervalsDecision MakingEthnicityAnthropology, CulturalFemaleHumansPregnancyResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicUnited StatesDecision MakingFamilyPregnancyQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID41475808
PMCPMC13059836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.