Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41475354›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2025

Variation in leaf utilization sites among three Calystegia (Solanales: Convolvulaceae)-feeding leaf beetle species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) partly explains differences in competitiveness: a case study of spatial analysis.

Natsuki Nomura, Atsushi Kasai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natsuki NomuraDepartment of Bioresource Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka City, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2839-0966
Atsushi KasaiDepartment of Bioresource Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka City, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In general, two or more species sharing the same niches are considered unable to coexist stably; instead, they either partition their niches spatiotemporally or compete, with one or more species eventually being excluded. Spatial niche partitioning is a common mechanism facilitating species coexistence. Three leaf beetle species, Aspidimorpha difformis (Motschulsky), Aspidimorpha transparipennis (Motschulsky), and Laccoptera nepalensis Boheman (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) appear to share spatiotemporal niches, as they all inhabit patches of Calystegia spp. R. Br. (Solanares: Convolvulceae) from spring to fall. Under rearing conditions, L. nepalensis excludes coexisting A. difformis but not A. transparipennis, by reducing the availability of oviposition sites on leaves. Given that herbivorous insects can exhibit resource preferences at fine spatial scales within leaves, this suggests that differences in leaf utilization sites between the two Aspidimorpha species determines their competitiveness against L. nepalensis. Here, we compared the feeding and oviposition sites within leaves among the three beetle species using spatial analysis and clustering. The feeding sites of L. nepalensis and the oviposition sites of A. difformis overlapped considerably, whereas the oviposition sites of A. transparipennis were largely unexploited by the others. All three species preferred lamina-abundant regions within leaves for oviposition, but this preference was weaker in L. nepalensis. Although it should be noted that this insight is based on limited data, these findings suggest that A. difformis is disadvantaged due to a higher risk of resource shortages. We argue that spatial analysis of consumption sites within leaves can more actively discuss spatial niche partitioning among herbivorous insects.

Indexed as

ColeopteraHerbivoryAnimalsCompetitive BehaviorEcosystemFeeding BehaviorFemaleOvipositionPlant LeavesSpatial AnalysisSpecies Specificitypopulation ecologyresource competitiontortoise beetle

Identifiers

PMID41475354
PMCPMC12755907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.