ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2025
Variation in leaf utilization sites among three Calystegia (Solanales: Convolvulaceae)-feeding leaf beetle species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) partly explains differences in competitiveness: a case study of spatial analysis.
Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feeding Preference Differentiation in Sympatric Willow Leaf Beetles Driven by Host Leaf Trait Divergence.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Variation in leaf utilization sites among three Calystegia (Solanales: Convolvulaceae)-feeding leaf beetle species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) partly explains differences in competitiveness: a case study of spatial analysis.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In general, two or more species sharing the same niches are considered unable to coexist stably; instead, they either partition their niches spatiotemporally or compete, with one or more species eventually being excluded. Spatial niche partitioning is a common mechanism facilitating species coexistence. Three leaf beetle species, Aspidimorpha difformis (Motschulsky), Aspidimorpha transparipennis (Motschulsky), and Laccoptera nepalensis Boheman (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) appear to share spatiotemporal niches, as they all inhabit patches of Calystegia spp. R. Br. (Solanares: Convolvulceae) from spring to fall. Under rearing conditions, L. nepalensis excludes coexisting A. difformis but not A. transparipennis, by reducing the availability of oviposition sites on leaves. Given that herbivorous insects can exhibit resource preferences at fine spatial scales within leaves, this suggests that differences in leaf utilization sites between the two Aspidimorpha species determines their competitiveness against L. nepalensis. Here, we compared the feeding and oviposition sites within leaves among the three beetle species using spatial analysis and clustering. The feeding sites of L. nepalensis and the oviposition sites of A. difformis overlapped considerably, whereas the oviposition sites of A. transparipennis were largely unexploited by the others. All three species preferred lamina-abundant regions within leaves for oviposition, but this preference was weaker in L. nepalensis. Although it should be noted that this insight is based on limited data, these findings suggest that A. difformis is disadvantaged due to a higher risk of resource shortages. We argue that spatial analysis of consumption sites within leaves can more actively discuss spatial niche partitioning among herbivorous insects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.