ArticleSleep medicine2026
Exploring sleep outcomes in youth across settings: Are there differences based on rurality or medically underserved status in the ECHO cohort?
Article in Sleep medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate associations between rurality and medically underserved status with sleep outcomes (e.g., duration, bed and wake times, latency) among youth in the United States.
methodsThe study sample included 22,234 youth (aged 1-17 years) from the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program. Sleep was measured by parent-report questionnaire for children ages 7 and under and child-report for older children. Residential addresses and Federal Information Processing Standards codes were utilized to classify participants into two binary exposure variables: rural vs. nonrural and medically underserved vs. not medically underserved. Differences between groups for each developmental period were compared using t-tests and chi-squared tests.
resultsAcross children ages 1-12, rural youth went to bed significantly earlier (mean differences [MD] range from 18 to 52 min) and woke earlier (MD range 15-52 min) compared to non-rural youth. Children aged 1-12 living in medically underserved areas were significantly less likely to meet sleep recommendations (MD range 3.2 %-6.6 % less), and youth of all ages tended to have later bedtimes (MD range 7-30 min) compared to youth not living in medically underserved areas. DISCUSSION: This study is novel because it evaluates differences in youth sleep health based on rurality and medically underserved status in the United States. Multiple variations in children's sleep health were identified based on living in medically underserved areas while minimal differences were noted based on rurality. Future research should focus on the development or dissemination of effective programs into pre-established resources (e.g., daycares, community centers) for youth in medically underserved areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.