ArticleNutrition reviews2026
Parents' and Children's Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Traditional and Novel Plant-Based Meat Alternatives: A Scoping Review.
Article in Nutrition reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Climate awareness and lower-meat eating among children and adolescents: potential behavioral pathways and contextual conditions.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing popularity of plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) as a sustainable dietary option highlights the need to understand family perceptions to support their integration into daily diets. Early-life food preferences often stem from parents or caregivers. This scoping review synthesized existing findings on parents' and children's perceptions of traditional and novel PBMAs and identified motivators and barriers to adopting them in family meals. A comprehensive search across 5 databases (Nutrition and Food Sciences, Web of Science, Global Health, Scopus, PsycINFO) was performed on April 1, 2024, using predefined terms. The review adhered to Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess study quality. Twenty studies were identified: 5 articles on parents or caregivers, 11 studies on children, and 4 articles on parent-child dyads. Parents were more accepting of traditional PBMAs (eg, lentils, tofu, beans, chickpeas), but expressed concerns over the nutritional adequacy, sodium content, and processing of novel PBMAs. Among parents who were non-regular users, traditional PBMAs were viewed mainly as a textural enhancement rather than a nutrient source. By contrast, children were generally more receptive to novel PBMAs compared with parents, particularly when products resembled meat and were linked to environmental and animal welfare benefits. For both parents and children, taste emerged as the primary driver for repeated consumption. Strategies to increase PBMA uptake in families should be focusing on improving the sensory appeal and nutritional profile of these products, enhancing product transparency around ingredients and processing technologies, and providing tailored nutrition education that aligns with existing knowledge and cooking skills. Family-based interventions that address both parental concerns and children's motivations may be particularly effective in positioning PBMAs as an accepted component of everyday family meals. Systematic Review Registration : Open Science Framework identifier osf.io/98n7r.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.