Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41474975›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Hidden Workers in Aging Australia: Protocol of Intersectionality-Informed Mixed Methods Study.

Sora Lee, Woojin Kang, Lu Yang, Mehak Batra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sora Lee *Department of Public Health, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe Univeristy, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2665-7794
Woojin Kang *Department of Economics, Hanbat National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0004-9720-8058
Lu Yang *Department of Public Health, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe Univeristy, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3764-6369
Mehak Batra *Department of Public Health, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe Univeristy, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2273-4948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAustralians are living longer and are expected to remain in the workforce for longer; yet, many older adults struggle to secure employment despite being willing and able to work. A growing share of these individuals are "hidden workers," those underused in the labor market due to missed hours, long-term unemployment, or withdrawal from job seeking despite the capacity to work. This group reflects a global trend of aging yet underused workforces, and in Australia, they represent a significant proportion of the working-age population. Addressing the challenges of hidden workers is crucial, as their inclusion could help meet labor market demands, alleviate fiscal pressures of aging, and promote healthier, more equitable aging trajectories.

objectiveThis intersectional mixed methods study has 3 overarching aims. First, to investigate how intersecting social identities (eg, age, gender, cultural background, health status, and caregiving responsibilities) shape hidden workforce participation and associated health outcomes among aging Australians. Second, to compare hidden workers with currently employed populations in order to identify health discrepancies between the 2 groups. Third, to explore the lived experiences of hidden workers, focusing on how intersecting and multiply disadvantaged identities impose additional burdens on employment outcomes and health status. Together, these aims will generate an integrated understanding of both structural and lived dimensions of hidden work, providing evidence to inform more equitable labor market and health policies.

methodsThis study uses an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to investigate the health, resources, and employment experiences of aging hidden workers in Australia. In phase 1, an online cross-sectional survey was administered to 1166 participants (696 hidden workers aged more than 45 years and 470 current workers), capturing variables on employment history, health, discrimination, workplace social capital, caregiving, and socioeconomic status. Validated instruments, including the Workplace Age Discrimination Scale, Intersectional Anticipated Discrimination Scale, and Workplace Social Capital Index, were incorporated to ensure reliability. Phase 2 will involve semistructured interviews with a purposive subsample (30 participants) identified from survey results, focusing on lived experiences of workforce exclusion and intersecting barriers. In phase 3, quantitative and qualitative findings will be integrated through triangulation and complementarity to provide a comprehensive understanding of hidden workers' challenges and assets, generating evidence to inform policy and stakeholder recommendations.

resultsAs of September 2025, the online survey has been completed, phase 2 interviews are underway, and phase 3 integration is scheduled for completion by mid-2026.

conclusionsThis study will generate the first intersectional evidence on the health and employment challenges of hidden aging workers in Australia. These insights will inform tailored policy interventions that can support re-engagement, reduce inequities in health and well-being, and strengthen workforce participation. Ultimately, the findings will contribute to addressing skills shortages while promoting social and economic inclusion of aging Australians. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/83401.

Indexed as

AgingEmploymentAgedAustraliaFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle Agedaging workersemploymenthealth status disparitieshidden workersintersectionalitymixed methodsunemployment

Identifiers

PMID41474975
PMCPMC12805321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.