ArticlePloS one2025
Correlation study of brain function changes after chemotherapy in breast cancer patients by automated fiber quantification based on diffusion tensor imaging.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thoracolumbar fascia ultrasound and elastography biomarkers in low back pain: a systematic review of associations and responsiveness to intervention.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
- Characterization of defensome genes and mobile genetic Elements in different types of pasture soil agroecosystems from the Brazilian Amazon.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026Article
- An Epidemiologic Review of Endocrine-disrupting Chemicals and Understudied Gynecologic Health Conditions Affecting Quality of Life.Current environmental health reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to evaluate the changes of white matter microstructure in breast cancer patients before and after chemotherapy based on automated fiber quantification (AFQ),as well as determine if these dispersion indexes are significantly correlated with clinical data. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-four breast cancer patients scheduled for chemotherapy were enrolled. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), neuropsychological tests and self-report measures, and hematological tests were conducted before chemotherapy(time 0,T0) and within one week after chemotherapy(time 1,T1). AFQ was used to track 20 fiber tracts in the brain. The correlation between average abnormal tracts and changes in neuropsychological tests and self-report measures and blood indicators was analyzed.
resultsCompared to T0, subjects at T1 showed decreased scores on the verbal fluency test; increased scores on the self-rating anxiety scale(SAS)and self-rating depression scale (SDS). Estrogen concentration was lower while luteinizing hormone(LH), follicle-stimulating hormone, and triglyceride levels were higher. Mean fractional anisotropy (FA) value decreased in the right cingulum cingulate(CGC)while mean radial diffusivity (RD) increased in the right CGC; mean axial diffusivity (AD) value decreased in callosum forceps major and callosum forceps minor. Changes in FA with in the right CGC were positively correlated with changes in SDS and LH, while changes in RD with in the right CGC were negatively correlated with changes in SDS and LH.
conclusionEarly changes observed in brain white matter fiber tracts, along with persistent hormone and triglyceride metabolism disorders, could potentially serve as neurobiological markers for monitoring chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.