ArticlePloS one2025
Temperature-dependence of early development of zebrafish and the consequences for laboratory use and animal welfare.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temperature-driven ontogenetic and morphological plasticity in Labeobarbus intermedius larvae from Lake Tana, Ethiopia.Journal of fish biology · 2026Article
- Molecular Iodine/Cells · 2026Article
- Embryotoxic effects of diflubenzuron active ingredient and commercial formulations: comparative insights from zebrafish model.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Zebrafish: a key model for unraveling endocrine-disrupting effects on thyroid development and function.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zebrafish (Danio rerio) are widely used in biological research, but the impact of incubation temperatures on developmental endpoints is still insufficiently studied. This study quantifies developmental differences in zebrafish embryos incubated at 26°C and 28°C, focusing on key endpoints (heartbeat onset, hatching time, eye size, yolk sac consumption, and body length). For this purpose, we recorded a high-resolution time series comprising hourly observations of early developmental stages and key events and bi-hourly observations of body length until 120 hours post fertilization. Additionally, we recorded a low-resolution time series at 72, 96, and 119 hours post fertilization for detailed measurements of eye size, yolk sac area, and body length. Embryos incubated at 26°C showed consistent delays in developmental stages compared to those at 28°C, with delays becoming more pronounced at later stages. Yolk sac consumption was delayed by about 19.8 hours at 26°C by 119 hours post fertilization, suggesting a delayed onset of independent feeding. These findings suggest that time-based regulatory limits for rearing zebrafish, such as the 120-hour threshold in German regulations (TierSchVerV), do not fully account for temperature-dependent development. The results emphasize the need for guidelines linking incubation temperatures to developmental progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.