Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41474796›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A pilot study for decellularizing porcine cornea for future use in corneal regeneration.

Natasha Josifovska, Essi M Niemi, Murugan Ramalingam, Geetha Manivasagam, Hanne Scholz, Goran Petrovski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natasha JosifovskaCenter for Eye Research and Innovative Diagnostics, Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3898-9729
Essi M NiemiVascular Biology and Surgery Group, Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Vascular Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Murugan RamalingamCentre for Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Theranostics, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6498-9792
Geetha ManivasagamCentre for Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Theranostics, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3326-3176
Hanne ScholzHybrid Technology Hub, Centre of Excellence, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Goran PetrovskiCenter for Eye Research and Innovative Diagnostics, Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2905-9252

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine corneas were decellularized for future use in corneal regeneration by using various washing steps with 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) detergent, Benzonase, and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The quality of the decellularized corneas was assessed by quantitative and qualitative measurement of DNA content, glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), immunofluorescent staining for Collagen (Col) I, V, Keratocan, Fibronectin, Laminin, Lumican and Decorin, and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to observe the structure of the collagen fibrils was used. The decellularization process showed 99.5% DNA content reduction in the corneas and a similar pattern was observed in the preservation of GAGs. Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) and immunofluorescent staining showed no presence of cell nuclei, while Alcian blue staining confirmed the presence of GAGs. Col I, V, Keratocan, Fibronectin, Laminin, Lumican and Decorin were still present in the decellularized corneas and TEM microscopy further confirmed the similar patterns of the collagen fibrils in the decellularized, compared to the native corneas. This pilot study showed our method is effective in decellularizing porcine corneas, with a very high amount of DNA being removed, while the GAGs being preserved to an acceptable extent, and the structure and pattern of the collagen fibrils maintained.

Indexed as

CorneaRegenerationAnimalsCollagenDNAGlycosaminoglycansMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionPilot ProjectsSwineTissue EngineeringCollagenDNAGlycosaminoglycans

Identifiers

PMID41474796
PMCPMC12755736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.