Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41474706›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Intelligence prediction of integrated circuit reliability based on SSA-LSTM fusion architecture.

Ying Qian, Bing Liu, Beibei Su, Chunyan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ying QianWuxi Vocational College of Science and Technology, Jiangsu Wuxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5516-4821
Bing LiuWuxi Vocational College of Science and Technology, Jiangsu Wuxi, China.
Beibei SuWuxi Vocational College of Science and Technology, Jiangsu Wuxi, China.
Chunyan ZhangWuxi Vocational College of Science and Technology, Jiangsu Wuxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relentless scaling of integrated circuits (ICs) into the nanoscale regime has intensified critical reliability challenges, such as Negative Bias Temperature Instability (NBTI), which manifests primarily as a progressive shift in the transistor threshold voltage ([Formula: see text]). This study focuses on the prognostics of digital integrated circuits (ICs) where Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors (MOSFETs) serve as the fundamental building blocks. Accurate prognostics of device degradation are paramount for predicting circuit lifetime, yet traditional models struggle with the nonlinearity of the degradation process. To address this challenge, a novel fusion architecture is proposed that synergistically combines the Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA) with a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network. The resulting SSA-LSTM model automates the optimization of crucial LSTM hyperparameters-including the number of hidden units, learning rate, and iteration count-thereby enhancing the capability to learn complex temporal degradation patterns. Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) is further integrated as a pre-processing step to denoise the temporal data. This model significantly reduces the average absolute error of [Formula: see text] prediction, outperforming benchmark models such as PSO and EMD-PSO. It can accurately capture the nonlinear trajectory of degradation curves and has high sensitivity for early anomaly detection, providing a high-precision data-driven solution for the reliability evaluation and prediction of digital ICs.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsReproducibility of ResultsSemiconductorsTransistors, Electronic

Identifiers

PMID41474706
PMCPMC12755746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.