ArticlePloS one2025
Modeling and experimental evaluation of biochar-mediated biofiltration for hydrogen sulfide capture from biogas.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancements in biochar nanocomposites: multifunctional platforms for sustainable energy storage and conversions.Nanoscale advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficient hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) removal is critical for enhancing biogas quality and enabling its utilization. This study proposes a novel, advanced modeling method for predicting H₂S removal efficiency (RE) in biofilters. This method requires fewer assumptions and less input data compared to traditional approaches. To investigate the influence of key parameters on RE, laboratory experiments were conducted using a biochar packed-bed biofilter. The experiments varied moisture content (MC), empty-bed residence time (EBRT), and influent H₂S concentration. All three variables significantly impacted RE, with optimal removal achieved using biochar with 30% MC, 60 seconds EBRT, and 180 ppmv H₂S. Multiple linear regression (MLR) and support vector machine (SVM) techniques were employed to model RE, achieving high accuracy with R² values of 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. These models effectively predicted H₂S removal in the biofilter, demonstrating the reliability and effectiveness of the proposed advanced modeling approach. Additionally, genetic algorithms were used for optimization, suggesting the feasibility of attaining 90-95% RE across a range of H₂S concentrations. Overall, this study introduces a groundbreaking modeling method for H₂S RE in biofilters, offering a practical solution for efficient biogas desulfurization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.