ArticlePloS one2025
The power of concentration: Antipredator responses to diluted frozen crayfish alarm cues provide insights on ecologically relevant concentrations and updates to methodology.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To optimize fitness when facing predation, animals perform threat-sensitive predator avoidance whereby they match the magnitude of the antipredator response to the severity of the perceived threat. Injury-released chemical alarm cues are a reliable indicator of predation risk in aquatic organisms, triggering overt antipredator responses upon detection by conspecifics. Animals with threat sensitivity typically have graded responses to increasing concentrations of these cues which plateau when a maximal response is reached, however, this is undocumented in crayfish. Furthermore, most research currently uses alarm cue exposures consisting of one crushed crayfish diluted in 100-400 mL of water, while it could be ecologically relevant for them to respond to lower concentrations, especially given that predation events can consist of bites or lacerations which would release less alarm cues. The quantity of cue administered into the tank (exposure concentration) is also highly variable, making experimental comparisons difficult. In our study, we collected crayfish alarm cues by rinsing five cut sites (to mimic laceration wounds) and diluting the cues in 100 mL to 100 L of water. Over two experiments, we determined the antipredator response of crayfish exposed to one of five alarm cue concentrations or a water control. During these trials, 20 mL of the cues were administered into 10 L of water, thereby standardizing the test subject's exposure to the cues. While we failed to find evidence of graded responses, we discovered that alarm cues elicited overt antipredator behaviour when diluted in up to 10 L of water, but this response was lost when cues were diluted in 100 L. Furthermore, this study is the first to successfully use frozen-thawed alarm cues in crayfish. These findings can help direct future research, providing information on the ecologically relevant range of chemical cues and improving welfare by reducing lab-animal sacrifice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.