ArticlePloS one2025
Gender dynamics in the relationship among student-teacher relationships, academic task engagement, academic task value, and positive developmental outcomes.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bingo Lab: game-based learning in microbiology.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- Toward a decent learning theory: a structural-psychological framework for understanding students' appraisals of learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines gender differences in the direct and indirect relationships among student-teacher relationships, academic task engagement, perceived academic task value, and positive developmental outcomes among secondary school students. A correlational research design was used, and a cross-sectional survey was conducted with 500 students from grades 9 and 10 across five selected secondary schools. Multi-stage sampling technique employed to select participants. The study utilized Multi-Group Structural Equation Modeling (MGSEM) to examine gender difference. The results indicate that the student-teacher relationship and students' perceived academic task value were associated with 40.3% of the variance in cognitive engagement among male students (R2 = 0.403), while they explain 31.9% of the variance for female students (R2 = 0.319). Regarding affective engagement, these factors were associated with 15.0% of the variance for males (R2 = 0.150) and 12.6% for females (R2 = 0.126). In terms of behavioral engagement, the model explains 26.4% of the variance for males (R2 = 0.264) and 32.8% for females (R2 = 0.328). Furthermore, the model were associated with 52.3% of the variance in positive development outcomes for male (R2 = 0.523) and 54.9% for female (R2 = 0.549). These findings underscore the necessity for gender-sensitive educational strategies that strengthen student-teacher relationships and tailor engagement approaches to promote positive developmental outcomes for both genders. Specifically, educators should focus on fostering supportive environments that recognize the unique needs of male and female students, thereby promoting higher levels of academic task engagement and positive developmental outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.